Re: Yet more sterility!

I don't understand your first point. I don't see how porn was responsible for the abjection of boysexual men. As for your second point, it is most doubtful that sex with a person is going to be ruined by porn for anyone. Sex is generally more fun than masturbation. I don't know about long term use of porn dulling the senses, whatever that means. This is like the notion that one can masturbate too much. I don't know what scientific basis there is for this notion. Solitary masturbation enabled by images gets to be too much? What exactly do you mean by too much? And does this mean that the images boys conjure in fantasy when they masturbate are equally harmful? The commodifaction point simply repeats your original assertion. We do lots of things for money. Having one's body admired by others is one of the more pleasant. Boylove does not diminish the sexual potency of boys, but neither does porn. To my knowledge, boys are not made impotent by viewing porn. I don't think you've added anything to your original account. The merit of porn is that it gives a great deal of pleasure. I don't see why that should be a problem. Your objections are formulated using such vague and and rhetorical language that they are very difficult to assess. It is the radical feminists who want porn banned. Pleasure-haters to left and right; it's all so very discouraging.