Post a response:
|
the argument was that - because someone who has never experienced A (natural puberty) - should not be allowed to experience B (pharmaceutical inhibition of puberty) instead, dio has made both of the terms the same. why the fuck doesn't he get this? nor is it surprising that dio attempts an implied grammatical correction ("sentence fragment") because it makes him look smart and important, an unreachable goal when in fact this contradicts english orthodoxy for the last several decades. it is likely dio never read Wm. S. Burroughs nor were or are my posts ever intended to represent formal grammar |