Threaded index     Date index     FAQ

Re: dio's brilliantly typical display of stupidity

Posted by diogenes on 2026-October-4 15:28:54, Sunday
In reply to dio's brilliantly typical display of stupidity posted by beracine on 2026-October-4 12:55:44, Sunday
Because someone has not experienced natural puberty, they should not be allowed to experience the inhibition of puberty? I am not sure how that alters the form of the argument. I have not experienced paragliding in the Andes. My staying at home inhibits this experience. Does it follow that I should not be allowed to stay at home?

Also, doesn't the argument establish the opposite conclusion by merely reversing the order of the propositions?:

- because someone has never experienced A (pharmaceutical inhibition of puberty)
- they should not be allowed to experience B (natural puberty)

I confess that I fail to follow your reasoning.

I must say, it's remarkably bold of you to compare the standard of your prose to that of William Burroughs, though I am not sure Burroughs would thank you for holding him up as a paradigm of "English orthodoxy".



diogenes
Follow ups:
Post a response:

Nickname:
Password:
Email (optional):
Subject:

Message:


Link URL (optional):
Link Title (optional):

Add your sigpic?

Here are Seven Rules for posting on this forum.

1. Do not post erotica or overly-detailed sexual discussions.
2. Do not request, offer, or post links to illegal material, including pictures.
3. Don't annoy the cogs.
4. Do not reveal identifying details about yourself or other posters.
5. Do not advocate or counsel sex with minors.
6. Do not post admissions of, or accuse others of, potentially illegal activities.
7. Do not request meetings with posters who are under age 18.

Posts made to BoyChat are subject to inclusion in the monthly BoyChat Digest. If you do not want your posts archived in the BC Digest, or want specific posts of yours removed after inclusion, please email The BC Digest.