|
Why are you just replying with a re:. and not cutting and pasting the subject line? Have you forgotten your dance moves, or is the move to make a statement with the first rere response and from that one on just retreat from the pissing contest? Let's try and do better if you want to continue getting your grape rewards. Also you really don't think it's moving the goal posts to go from "You can in no way describe x as y" verses "In my opinion x does not accurately describe y." People are generally recognized by everyone has having the ability to describe things with commonly understood terms, so saying they can in no way is just factually wrong. The but you would be wrong part of your quote was cut off because it was irrelevant. Your argument wasn't that Chuck was wrong to think western countries have rape culture. Your argument was that people can in no way describe, which ignores the glaringly obvious case of "wrong descriptions" (since the wrong way is a way). You have a habit of moving the goal posts when you are wrong and here is no different. That is not to say that Chuck was wrong in his description, but just taking baby steps along the path of showing you that you are wrong, since you are having such a hard time keeping up. Speaking of you being wrong, it's no one else's job to spoon feed you examples. You have the link to wikipedia's well thought out definitions of rape culture, plus a few examples of subgroups provided earlier. If you spent half the energy trying to understand what people are saying as you spent asking disingenuous questions and moving the goal posts, maybe you'd learn something. |