| 
It's not about the norm, but the framing. As I spoke of elsewhere, bisexuality is also compatible with marriage. Bisexuality, in the modern day, is a far more common occurrence than exclusive homosexuality. Would it be accurate, then, to say that most people with same sex attraction can marry and have children? While it may be true statistically, it is the framing that matters, trying to use marriage compatibility as an argument against identification with a "gay" label. It also erases those who reject marriage and reproduction, even if a minority, it's not as though their voices cease to exist. I do not believe I have ever made a moral case against pederasty. What I have said is that I find it in poor taste when a more basal desire is the whole goal, as E.E Bradford said, "Love is the blossom, Friendship is the fruit.". I'm also not too interested in making such a case, I am not a moral or moralistic person. I have read some articles, yes. As I said, I have used the website before. My disagreements with others here just feeds into my own hesitance to provide content for the website, my thoughts about ideological bias are largely separate. I agree re: all homosexual activity. The oddity is trying to split between homosexual activity so cleanly, especially when such tendencies towards youths are present in both 'sides'. Age gaps, 'twinks', IMO these are all reflections of the same impulse.  |