I've just read the abstract

I couldn't find the full article, but from the abstract, it is only about a relatively small sample and focuses on the comparison of CSA cases regarding mental health outcomes depending on the age of the "perpetrator". Spoiler alert: no meaningful difference whether it is a kid, a teenager or an adult. No mention that the perception of people classified as CSA victims is studied in any other way. The only sentence that comes close to it is the last one: "individuals who were abused by other children were less likely to label their experiences as abuse." It only means that children are more likely to consider that they have been abused if their sexual experience was with an adult. No surprise, as the dominant narrative is that child abuse is committed by adults, and that's what prevention messages towards kids mostly target. Maybe one of the least surprising article ever written, but science needs that kind as well I suppose. Lots of happy boys to you, FF mi lon. mute mije lili kin li lon. o sina kute e mi, mi ala wile, pilin pona mi li anpa e pilin ante.