Post a response:
|
No it isn't. Yes it is. its attacking the person rather than the argument, especially as theres no way to determine sealioning vs a genuine request for information. When "what you said" has already been addressed in previous discussions Except it hasnt been addressed. Jumping straight to "sealion" is not addressing anything. Considering something previously settled is an opinion. Great, so in your opinion its addressed, in mine, its not. No one is saying that you can't make the same old asinine arguments You cannot give one example of an asinine argument I have made. They get used to going by weird stretched out definitions of words Its not a weird stretched out definition. an argument is a connected set of logical statements that leads to a conclusion. You dont know what an argument is so for example Valid arguments may contain less valid aspects is not an argument. get caught try to bully others having standards of reason and evidence is not bullying. which just happen to draw the moral line just behind themselves. What are you on about? Where have I done this? |