The "Disappearing" Sense of FairnessPsychological research suggests that a child's innate sense of fairness doesn't actually disappear; it evolves into a more complex, strategic, and context-dependent system. Here is why the "pure" equality of childhood seems to fade: 1. The Knowledge-Behavior GapYounger children often understand fairness norms long before they have the impulse control to follow them. As noted by research in Scientific Reports, 2. Reputation & Strategic FairnessAs children age, they move from "being fair" to "appearing fair." According to studies found via Oxford Academic, by age 8, children become hyper-aware of social signaling. They may use "fair" processes (like flipping a coin) to mask a desire for a specific outcome, prioritizing their reputation over actual equity. 3. Transition from Equality to Equity
By school age, children begin to believe that those who work harder deserve more. This shift is often mistaken for a loss of fairness, but it is actually a sophisticated move toward meritocracy. 4. Inequity Aversion AsymmetryChildren develop "Disadvantageous Inequity Aversion" (hating when they get less) very early. However, "Advantageous Inequity Aversion" (hating when they get more than others) develops much later, usually around age 8 or 9, as discussed in PNAS. 5. Environmental ConditioningChildren are "intuitive economists." If they grow up in environments where resources are scarce or competition is rewarded, they dynamically adjust their internal fairness "settings" to favor relative advantage over absolute equality to ensure survival or success. "Fairness is not a fixed trait, but a moving target shaped by social survival."I'd like to read the actual studies. Of course, the chatbot gives "the party line" that the psych industry spews out. At least, that's what my superego is probably telling my ego. I wonder what my id thinks of all that? ;-) M. Even notice that Freud is close in spelling to Fraud? |