Post a response:
|
Back during my boy job years, I was always front and center to in the locker rooms and bathrooms. Towards the end of my boy job years, I started working with uncircumcised boys which was new to me (from US). I always made sure they pull back their foreskins when they peed and when they took their showers and baths. I was surprised how many of them didn't know that they were suppose to do that. I am still partial to circumcised boys. Maybe because I am American. The Ohio guy wasn't defiant, per se. He was just psychotic. It wouldn't shock me if his brain was ravaged from meth. Zakrzewski wasn't defiant. The only things he did were cringe, but not defiant. That's when he tried firing his public defenders in the middle of his trial and said that some of his experiences with his boys were authentic and loving (which I'm sure his lawyers told him to say to make himself look less like the monster that the judge and jury viewed him as). Zakrzewski also wasn't offered a plea deal. By CA law, the DA is prohibited from offering plea deals in certain cases like molestation. I'm just saying. Apparently some of the boys liked or didn't mind getting head from Zakrzewski and he should had gotten some back or some ass since it wasn't going to make a difference in his sentence. In fact, he should had taken those boys across state lines for sex and shared his homemade movies/pictures and would had gotten a lesser sentence. The most fucked up part is that even if he ever got paroled, he would probably be civilly confined to a state mental hospital for the rest of his life. |