|
"The thing is, this gynecomastia, when its effects are subtle, as they usually are, can add yet another erotic charge to a boy." Sounds like a matter of personal preference. When it comes to girls I might agree, but then society's eroticization of the female nipple becomes a confounding variable. On a boy it just looks conspicuous and weird especially with the way the breast tissue is concentrated around the nipple without the typical apportionment of fat deposits to round out its appearance. "I’ve already proven the existence of the pederasty gene." Clearly you have not. "Is gynecomastia one of the traits selected to push the pubescent boy into stark light of sexual desirability?" No. It rather seems like you've talked yourself into thinking that everything in nature has a "purpose," at least insofar as pedophilia/pederasty goes. Nature is much messier than that. ![]() |