Post a response:
|
AI is certainly not the arbiter of truth -- just ask it about pederasty! But, for something like this, where I'm not going to put in the years of study required, it's a reasonable summation of what's on the record. One has to look out for hallucinations, but they don't occur in the types of answers it was giving. And it's hard to imagine it would be programmed to skew the info available. Your reading would make sense if one's goal is to protect the theory nutrition works only in one direction, and maybe it fits the article better. But they sure said it badly. |