You dont get to just invent a word/concept and act like its a real thing. Of course I didn't invent it. It was first used by Patterson Du Bois in 1903. Did you even bother looking it up? Even Wikipedia has an article for it, even though it is incredibly adultist as it blocks people for being pedophiles, advocating for pedophiles, advocating for adult-child sexual relations, opposing WP:CHILDPRO, etc. I'm wondering if, unlike most people here, you actually oppose sexual relations with children, not just because they're currently illegal, but you want them to remain illegal. Because someone who wants to significantly lower or abolish the age of consent would surely recognise that adultism exists and is a problem. They're opposing adultism in one of the most radical ways possible. Surely there is at least one form of adultism which you oppose? Like do you think 21 is too high of a drinking age? Do you think hitting kids is wrong? In fact, you have argued with Manstruprator that hitting kids is wrong. Well, did you know that it stems from adultism? Surely you think there's other ways kids are treated unjustly because they're kids too? |