Monodont gave 2 pieces of evidence of anti-MAP discrination. 1. food 2. interaction Errant picked on the second and made completely false guesses about the emotions and content of the interaction. Errant did not address Monodont's first piece of evidence because Errant would in effect have to say that bad food is really good food. He's trying to do the same thing with the second piece of evidence because the data is softer. By twisting the second story, Errant was gaslighting Monodont into thinking people were not mistreating him... that he should just continue to take the abuse AND DO NOTHING Now you know why Errant is really here |