This might be the biggest pile of shit ever posted to "bC".
Your argument against anti-feminism as part of an explanation for the boylove condition:- It's too easy, "sav[ing] us the grindingly difficult task of thinking it through" etc.
- There's another better explanation, but we have to find it.
You then go onto tell us how hard it's going to be to find it, but that we ought to try. You never once mention what that something else might be, except vaguely "to understand how things got to be as they are we first need to understand how they are now", which you estimate will be about as hard to do as "mastering cold fusion".
So basically, when you get down to it, you have no ideas, no pathway forward to reach any goal. Only vague notions that add up to "Kit don't like this."
And I think they underestimate the amount of hard, unglamorous work there is to be done. The problem with the anti-feminists is that they merely want to change the world; the point is first to interpret it.
Then there's kit, who doesn't want to do any work at all.
It amuses me, just a little, to read comments by people who (a) have no ideas, and (b) no plans, regale us with their visions for going nowhere.
Here's to another 20 years of success. | |
From his Throne,
The King of Zembla
|
